I will try to do this today with the hope to be able to shed some light on a rather bizarre attack which will nevertheless have profound consequences. To believe that it would require you to find the following sequence logical: Then, the US declares that overthrowing Assad is not a priority anymore up to here this is all factual and true. Then, Assad decides to use weapons he does not have.
Antoine Destutt de Tracy The term "ideology" was born during the Reign of Terror of French Revolutionand acquired several other meanings thereafter. The word, and the system of ideas associated with it, was coined by Antoine Destutt de Tracy in while he was in prison pending trial during the Terror.
The coup that overthrew Maximilien Robespierre allowed Tracy to pursue his work. He devised the term for a "science of ideas" he hoped would form a secure foundation for the moral and political sciences.
He based the word on two things: He conceived "Ideology" as a liberal philosophy that would defend individual liberty, property, free marketsand constitutional limits on state power. He argues that among these aspects ideology is the most generic term, because the science of ideas also contains the study of their expression and deduction.
According to Karl Mannheim 's historical reconstruction of the shifts in the meaning of ideology, the modern meaning of the word was born when Napoleon used it to describe his opponents as "the ideologues". In the century after Tracy, the term ideology moved back and forth between positive and negative connotations.
He describes ideology as rather like teaching philosophy by the Socratic methodbut without extending the vocabulary beyond what the general reader already possessed, and without the examples from observation that practical science would require.
Taine identifies it not just with Destutt De Tracy, but also with his milieu, and includes Condillac as one of its precursors. Destutt de Tracy read the works of Locke and Condillac while he was imprisoned during the Reign of Terror.
The term "ideology" has dropped some of its pejorative stingand has become a neutral term in the analysis of differing political opinions and views of social groups. Some have described this kind of analysis as meta-ideology—the study of the structure, form, and manifestation of ideologies.
Recent analysis tends to posit that ideology is a coherent system of ideas that rely on a few basic assumptions about reality that may or may not have any factual basis. Ideas become ideologies that is, become coherent, repeated patterns through the subjective ongoing choices that people make, serving as the seed around which further thought grows.
According to most recent analysis, ideologies are neither necessarily right nor wrong. Believers in ideology range from passive acceptance through fervent advocacy to true belief. This accords with definitions, such as by Manfred Steger and Paul Jamesthat emphasize both the issue of patterning and contingent claims to truth: Ideologies are patterned clusters of normatively imbued ideas and concepts, including particular representations of power relations.
These conceptual maps help people navigate the complexity of their political universe and carry claims to social truth. Charles Blattberg offers an account that distinguishes political ideologies from political philosophies.
Minar describes six different ways the word "ideology" has been used: As a collection of certain ideas with certain kinds of content, usually normative As the form or internal logical structure that ideas have within a set By the role ideas play in human-social interaction By the role ideas play in the structure of an organization As meaning, whose purpose is persuasion As the locus of social interaction For Willard A.
Mullins an ideology should be contrasted with the related but different issues of utopia and historical myth. An ideology is composed of four basic characteristics:National liberation, national renaissance, the restoration of nationhood to the people, commonwealth: whatever may be the headings used or the new formulas introduced, decolonization is always a .
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Cults did not fade away (as some would like to believe) with the passing of the s and ’70s, when they were first recognized in many places around the world for their growing presence and sometimes controversial practices and activities.
order of Utopia, but not in utopian speculation about happiness. The utopians themselves admit they debate as to whether virtue is an end in itself or not. Remarkably to a Christian, nothing in the utopian understanding of happiness is ordered to the love of God. Certainly the love of God that characterizes the City of God is absent from Utopia.
Making Sense of the Nonsensical: An Analysis of Jonestown by Neal Osherow.
Mainpage | Contact Us | E-mail Directory | Discussion Forum. Read also Special Feature Remembering Jonestown 20 Years After | More on Jonestown | Leo Ryan Revisiting Jonestown. FBI Files on Jonestown.
. The excerpt that follows presents Hexter's observations on Christian Humanism as the context for the Utopia; in the concluding section, "The Radicalism of Utopia," Hexter argues that More's vision transcended its time in its image of social equality.