Both of these demographic trends echo findings from the first survey in this series.
Coming from the French word for "looking upon," the term encompasses not only visual observation but also the scrutiny of all behavior, speech, and actions.
Prominent examples of surveillance include surveillance cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. One-way observation is in some ways an expression of control. Just as having a stranger stare at you for an extended period of time can be uncomfortable and hostile, it is no different from being under constant surveillance, except that surveillance is often done surreptitiously and at the behest of some authority.
Todays technological capabilities take surveillance to new levels; no longer are spyglasses and "dropping" from the eaves of a roof necessary to observe individuals - the government can and does utilize methods to observe all the behavior and actions of people without the need for a spy to be physically present.
However, after the passage of FISA and subsequent laws, citizens have not been given the same protection with regards to electronic surveillance. As there have been massive changes in technology and lifestyle since the s, electronic surveillance could be considered much more invasive than a physical search, yet as has been made clear in the legal section of this website, it is in fact much easier for government agents to perform surveillance.
Why there is such disparity between these standards to us a matter of serious concern.
Thus, the government's use of closed-circuit television cameras in public spaces, warrantless wiretapping, and library record checks have the potential to save lives from criminals and terrorists with only minimal invasion of its citizens' privacy. It is a matter of course that most people in our society would object to this solution, not because they wish to commit any wrongdoings, but because it is invasive and prone to abuse.
Now consider that, given current technology, the government already has the ability to track a known target's movements to a reasonable degree, and has easy access to information such as one's purchasing habits, online activities, phone conversations, and mail. Though implementing mandatory location tracking devices for the whole population is certainly more invasive than the above, we argue that current practices are analogous, extreme, and equally unacceptable.
Records show that he used the system illegally at least times before he was caught Mark With the expansion of surveillance, such abuses could become more numerous and more egregious as the amount of personal data collected increases.
In addition, allowing surreptitious surveillance of one form, even limited in scope and for a particular contingency, encourages government to expand such surveillance programs in the future. It is our view that the danger of a "slippery slope" scenario cannot be dismissed as paranoia - as a prominent example, the collection of biometric has expanded immensely in the past several years.
Many schools in the UK collect fingerprints of children as young as six without parental consent Dowardand fingerprinting in American schools has been widespread since the mid-eighties NYT National Desk When data is collected, whether such data remains used for its stated purpose after its collection has been called into question, even by government officials: This non-uniqueness and immutability of information provides great potential for abuse by individuals and institutions.
When is surveillance appropriate? Many different groups define appropriate bounds for surveillance in different manners.
One viewpoint that we have found interesting is that of M. The Data Collection Context Awareness: Right to challenge and express a grievance: Are there means for discovering violations and penalties to encourage responsible surveillant behavior? Adequate data stewardship and protection: Equality-inequality regarding availability and application: The symbolic meaning of a method: The creation of unwanted precedents: Negative effects on surveillors and third parties: The goodness of fit between the means and the goal: Information used for original vs.
Failure to share secondary gains from the information:Sep 15, · News about surveillance of citizens by government. Commentary and archival information about surveillance of citizens by government from The New York Times.
leslutinsduphoenix.com no longer supports Internet. Government surveillance of the Internet is a power with the potential for massive abuse. Like its precursor of telephone wiretapping, it must be subjected to meaningful judicial process before it is authorized.
Men are also more likely than women to be “very concerned” about surveillance over their own activities on mobile apps Could you please explain briefly why you have this level of concern about government surveillance of Americans’ personal data and electronic communications?
About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a.
The Ethics of Surveillance Introduction to Surveillance. Surveillance is, simply put, the observation and/or monitoring of a person.
Coming from the French word for "looking upon," the term encompasses not only visual observation but also the scrutiny of all behavior, speech, and actions. Provide for increased transparency around government surveillance, both from the government and companies.
Recommit to the Internet Freedom agenda in a way that directly addresses issues raised by NSA surveillance, including moving toward international human-rights based standards on surveillance. But the ongoing revelations of government eavesdropping have had a profound impact on the economy, the security of the internet and the credibility of the \[ \].